Applicable Project Codes
Standard
Building Regulations and Standards
Application area
Compliance review
Project relevance
Current adopted editions verified against design documentation during review.
Design review, peer checking, tender evaluation and construction-phase advisory providing independent engineering oversight through project delivery.
Technical consultancy at SEINZEN provides independent engineering oversight for clients, developers and asset owners who require assurance beyond standard design delivery. Services include design review, peer checking, tender evaluation, site inspection and technical due diligence across all MEP disciplines.
Design review assesses third-party design documentation against project requirements, applicable standards and engineering best practice. Peer checking provides independent verification of calculation methods, equipment selections and system strategies before construction issue.
Owner-side advisory supports clients through tender evaluation, contractor selection and construction-phase decision-making. Site inspections verify installation quality against design intent with documented findings and recommendation reports.
Technical due diligence for acquisitions and refinancing assesses MEP system condition, remaining life, compliance status and capital expenditure requirements for existing building portfolios.
Independent assessment of design documentation against brief, standards and engineering best practice.
Verification of calculation methods, equipment selections and system strategies by independent engineers.
Technical assessment of contractor submissions, value engineering proposals and bid compliance.
Client representation through design, tender and construction phases with independent technical guidance.
Construction-phase inspections with documented findings, photographs and corrective action recommendations.
MEP condition assessment, compliance review and capex forecasting for property transactions.
Independent assessment of cost reduction proposals against performance, compliance and lifecycle impact.
Technical analysis and reporting for contractual disputes, defects claims and insurance assessments.
Verification of design compliance against applicable codes, standards and project-specific requirements.
Advisory scope, review criteria, reporting format and deliverable schedule agreed with client at engagement outset.
Systematic review of design documentation against checklist criteria with findings categorised by severity.
Independent calculations, compliance checks and best practice comparison supporting review findings.
Structured review report with findings, recommendations and priority ranking issued to client.
Design team response review and verification of corrective actions through to resolution.
Ongoing site inspection, query response and decision support through installation and commissioning.
Structured checklists covering load calculations, system selection, code compliance and coordination completeness.
Independent recalculation and cross-verification of critical design parameters and equipment sizing.
Evaluation of contractor submissions against specification requirements, exclusions and qualifications.
Visual inspection, operational testing and remaining life assessment for due diligence surveys.
Comparison of existing installations against current code requirements identifying upgrade obligations.
Replacement cost and timing estimates for major MEP plant and infrastructure components.
Performance, compliance and lifecycle cost analysis of proposed design changes or substitutions.
Installation quality criteria for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems during site inspection.
Comparison of metered consumption and system performance against design predictions and benchmarks.
Technical risk register development with probability, impact and mitigation strategy recommendations.
Risk_score = Probability × Impact
Risk_score = risk rating; Probability = likelihood (1–5); Impact = consequence severity (1–5)
Technical risk prioritisation for design review findings and due diligence assessments.
Risk matrix thresholds defined per client risk appetite at engagement outset.
Remaining_life = Design_life − Age
Remaining_life = estimated remaining service life (years); Design_life = expected service life; Age = current age (years)
MEP equipment remaining life estimation for due diligence capex forecasting.
Adjust for maintenance history, operating conditions and condition survey findings.
Replacement_cost = Unit_cost × Quantity × Location_factor
Replacement_cost = estimated replacement cost; Unit_cost = benchmark unit cost; Quantity = number of units; Location_factor = regional cost adjustment
Capital expenditure forecasting for major MEP plant replacement in due diligence.
Include installation, commissioning and temporary provision costs where applicable.
Compliance_gap = Current_standard − Installed_capability
Compliance_gap = performance or capacity shortfall; Current_standard = applicable code requirement; Installed_capability = existing system performance
Identification of upgrade requirements for existing buildings against current code editions.
Grandfathering provisions and trigger conditions assessed per jurisdiction.
Final design values must be determined using project-specific inputs, applicable standards, manufacturer data and engineering judgement.
Design review includes assessment of BIM model quality, LOD compliance and coordination completeness against project BEP requirements.
Due diligence surveys may include existing condition modelling from point cloud or manual survey data for asset documentation.
Review findings reference model element tags and drawing references for traceability to specific design issues.
As-built model review verifies installed conditions against construction issue models during handover advisory.
Applicable Project Codes
Building Regulations and Standards
Compliance review
Current adopted editions verified against design documentation during review.
Client Technical Requirements
Employer Requirements
Design review criteria
Project-specific performance, quality and documentation requirements.
ISO 9001
Quality Management Systems
Review process
Structured review process with documented findings and corrective action tracking.
RICS Technical Due Diligence
Building Surveying Standards
Due diligence
Condition assessment methodology and reporting standards for property transactions.
CIBSE Design Review Guidance
Peer Review Best Practice
Peer checking
Independent verification methodology for building services design.
ASHRAE Standards Portfolio
HVAC Design Standards
Mechanical review
Reference standards for mechanical design review and compliance verification.
IEC / BS 7671 / NFPA 70
Electrical Standards
Electrical review
Reference standards for electrical design review and compliance verification.
NFPA Fire Protection Standards
Fire Protection Standards
Fire review
Reference standards for fire protection design review and compliance verification.
ISO 19650
BIM Information Management
BIM review
BIM deliverable quality and information management review criteria.
Institution of Civil Engineers
Design Review Protocol
Review process
Structured design review process for infrastructure and building projects.
Local Authority Requirements
Approval and Compliance
Regulatory review
Authority having jurisdiction requirements verified during compliance review.
Insurance and Warranty Requirements
Project Insurance Standards
Risk assessment
Insurance-driven technical requirements for covered projects and claims.
| Code | Standard | Application area | Project relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applicable Project Codes | Building Regulations and Standards | Compliance review | Current adopted editions verified against design documentation during review. |
| Client Technical Requirements | Employer Requirements | Design review criteria | Project-specific performance, quality and documentation requirements. |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management Systems | Review process | Structured review process with documented findings and corrective action tracking. |
| RICS Technical Due Diligence | Building Surveying Standards | Due diligence | Condition assessment methodology and reporting standards for property transactions. |
| CIBSE Design Review Guidance | Peer Review Best Practice | Peer checking | Independent verification methodology for building services design. |
| ASHRAE Standards Portfolio | HVAC Design Standards | Mechanical review | Reference standards for mechanical design review and compliance verification. |
| IEC / BS 7671 / NFPA 70 | Electrical Standards | Electrical review | Reference standards for electrical design review and compliance verification. |
| NFPA Fire Protection Standards | Fire Protection Standards | Fire review | Reference standards for fire protection design review and compliance verification. |
| ISO 19650 | BIM Information Management | BIM review | BIM deliverable quality and information management review criteria. |
| Institution of Civil Engineers | Design Review Protocol | Review process | Structured design review process for infrastructure and building projects. |
| Local Authority Requirements | Approval and Compliance | Regulatory review | Authority having jurisdiction requirements verified during compliance review. |
| Insurance and Warranty Requirements | Project Insurance Standards | Risk assessment | Insurance-driven technical requirements for covered projects and claims. |
Applicable standards depend on the project location, building use, authority having jurisdiction, employer requirements and contract documents. The current adopted edition must be confirmed at the beginning of each project.
Structured findings with severity ranking, recommendations and reference to design documents.
Independent verification of calculations, selections and compliance with signed certification.
Technical assessment of contractor submissions with compliance matrix and recommendation.
Documented findings with photographs, location references and corrective action requirements.
MEP condition assessment, compliance status and capex forecast for property transactions.
Impact analysis of proposed changes against performance, compliance and lifecycle cost.
Existing installation assessment against current code requirements with upgrade recommendations.
Technical risks with probability, impact, mitigation and responsibility assignment.
Technical analysis and opinion for dispute resolution, defects claims or insurance assessment.
Periodic advisory meeting records with action items and decision documentation.
Assessment of commissioning completeness, documentation quality and operational readiness.
Post-occupancy assessment comparing operational data against design predictions.
Review criteria and checklists agreed with client before document review commences.
Findings independently verified by second reviewer before report issue.
Peer check calculations performed using independent methods and software where applicable.
Site inspection findings supported by photographic evidence and location references.
Due diligence reports reviewed against RICS or client-specified reporting standards.
Advisory recommendations clearly distinguished from design decisions remaining with design team.
Developer clients requiring independent oversight of design and construction contractor performance.
Property acquisitions and refinancing requiring MEP due diligence and capex forecasting.
Public sector projects with independent peer review and value for money assessment requirements.
Complex buildings where design and build contractor proposals require independent technical evaluation.
Dispute resolution and defects investigation requiring expert technical analysis and reporting.
Portfolio asset management requiring condition surveys and compliance gap analysis across multiple properties.
Design review assesses documentation against brief, standards and best practice with findings and recommendations. Peer checking provides independent recalculation and verification of specific design outputs with formal certification of review completion.
Advisory can begin at any project stage. Early engagement at concept or schematic design provides greatest influence on outcomes. Construction-phase advisory supports quality verification and decision-making during installation.
Due diligence includes visual condition survey, operational testing where accessible, compliance assessment against current codes, remaining life estimation and capital expenditure forecasting for major plant replacement.
Technical assessment of contractor submissions evaluates compliance with specifications, qualifications, exclusions and value engineering proposals. Scored evaluation matrices support client decision-making alongside commercial assessment.
Technical analysis and reporting supports contractual disputes, defects claims and insurance assessments. Reports are prepared to standards acceptable for adjudication, arbitration or litigation proceedings.
Contact our advisory team to review design audit, peer checking, due diligence or owner-side representation requirements for your project.