Skip to main content
Advisory services

Independent technical consultancy for project assurance

Design review, peer checking, tender evaluation and construction-phase advisory providing independent engineering oversight through project delivery.

Service scope

Technical consultancy at SEINZEN provides independent engineering oversight for clients, developers and asset owners who require assurance beyond standard design delivery. Services include design review, peer checking, tender evaluation, site inspection and technical due diligence across all MEP disciplines.

Design review assesses third-party design documentation against project requirements, applicable standards and engineering best practice. Peer checking provides independent verification of calculation methods, equipment selections and system strategies before construction issue.

Owner-side advisory supports clients through tender evaluation, contractor selection and construction-phase decision-making. Site inspections verify installation quality against design intent with documented findings and recommendation reports.

Technical due diligence for acquisitions and refinancing assesses MEP system condition, remaining life, compliance status and capital expenditure requirements for existing building portfolios.

Key engineering capabilities

  • Design review and audit

    Independent assessment of design documentation against brief, standards and engineering best practice.

  • Peer checking

    Verification of calculation methods, equipment selections and system strategies by independent engineers.

  • Tender evaluation support

    Technical assessment of contractor submissions, value engineering proposals and bid compliance.

  • Owner-side advisory

    Client representation through design, tender and construction phases with independent technical guidance.

  • Site inspection and reporting

    Construction-phase inspections with documented findings, photographs and corrective action recommendations.

  • Technical due diligence

    MEP condition assessment, compliance review and capex forecasting for property transactions.

  • Value engineering review

    Independent assessment of cost reduction proposals against performance, compliance and lifecycle impact.

  • Expert witness and dispute support

    Technical analysis and reporting for contractual disputes, defects claims and insurance assessments.

  • Standards and code compliance review

    Verification of design compliance against applicable codes, standards and project-specific requirements.

Design and delivery methodology

  1. 01

    Scope and brief agreement

    Advisory scope, review criteria, reporting format and deliverable schedule agreed with client at engagement outset.

  2. 02

    Document review

    Systematic review of design documentation against checklist criteria with findings categorised by severity.

  3. 03

    Analysis and assessment

    Independent calculations, compliance checks and best practice comparison supporting review findings.

  4. 04

    Report issue

    Structured review report with findings, recommendations and priority ranking issued to client.

  5. 05

    Follow-up and verification

    Design team response review and verification of corrective actions through to resolution.

  6. 06

    Construction-phase advisory

    Ongoing site inspection, query response and decision support through installation and commissioning.

Technical design criteria

  • Design review criteria frameworks

    Structured checklists covering load calculations, system selection, code compliance and coordination completeness.

  • Peer check methodology

    Independent recalculation and cross-verification of critical design parameters and equipment sizing.

  • Tender compliance assessment

    Evaluation of contractor submissions against specification requirements, exclusions and qualifications.

  • MEP condition survey methods

    Visual inspection, operational testing and remaining life assessment for due diligence surveys.

  • Compliance gap analysis

    Comparison of existing installations against current code requirements identifying upgrade obligations.

  • Capital expenditure forecasting

    Replacement cost and timing estimates for major MEP plant and infrastructure components.

  • Value engineering impact assessment

    Performance, compliance and lifecycle cost analysis of proposed design changes or substitutions.

  • Construction quality assessment

    Installation quality criteria for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems during site inspection.

  • Operational performance review

    Comparison of metered consumption and system performance against design predictions and benchmarks.

  • Risk identification and mitigation

    Technical risk register development with probability, impact and mitigation strategy recommendations.

Engineering principles and calculation approaches

  • Risk_score = Probability × Impact

    Variables

    Risk_score = risk rating; Probability = likelihood (1–5); Impact = consequence severity (1–5)

    Application

    Technical risk prioritisation for design review findings and due diligence assessments.

    Notes

    Risk matrix thresholds defined per client risk appetite at engagement outset.

  • Remaining_life = Design_life − Age

    Variables

    Remaining_life = estimated remaining service life (years); Design_life = expected service life; Age = current age (years)

    Application

    MEP equipment remaining life estimation for due diligence capex forecasting.

    Notes

    Adjust for maintenance history, operating conditions and condition survey findings.

  • Replacement_cost = Unit_cost × Quantity × Location_factor

    Variables

    Replacement_cost = estimated replacement cost; Unit_cost = benchmark unit cost; Quantity = number of units; Location_factor = regional cost adjustment

    Application

    Capital expenditure forecasting for major MEP plant replacement in due diligence.

    Notes

    Include installation, commissioning and temporary provision costs where applicable.

  • Compliance_gap = Current_standard − Installed_capability

    Variables

    Compliance_gap = performance or capacity shortfall; Current_standard = applicable code requirement; Installed_capability = existing system performance

    Application

    Identification of upgrade requirements for existing buildings against current code editions.

    Notes

    Grandfathering provisions and trigger conditions assessed per jurisdiction.

Final design values must be determined using project-specific inputs, applicable standards, manufacturer data and engineering judgement.

BIM, Revit and integrated design

  • Design review includes assessment of BIM model quality, LOD compliance and coordination completeness against project BEP requirements.

  • Due diligence surveys may include existing condition modelling from point cloud or manual survey data for asset documentation.

  • Review findings reference model element tags and drawing references for traceability to specific design issues.

  • As-built model review verifies installed conditions against construction issue models during handover advisory.

International standards and codes

Applicable Project Codes

Standard

Building Regulations and Standards

Application area

Compliance review

Project relevance

Current adopted editions verified against design documentation during review.

Client Technical Requirements

Standard

Employer Requirements

Application area

Design review criteria

Project relevance

Project-specific performance, quality and documentation requirements.

ISO 9001

Standard

Quality Management Systems

Application area

Review process

Project relevance

Structured review process with documented findings and corrective action tracking.

RICS Technical Due Diligence

Standard

Building Surveying Standards

Application area

Due diligence

Project relevance

Condition assessment methodology and reporting standards for property transactions.

CIBSE Design Review Guidance

Standard

Peer Review Best Practice

Application area

Peer checking

Project relevance

Independent verification methodology for building services design.

ASHRAE Standards Portfolio

Standard

HVAC Design Standards

Application area

Mechanical review

Project relevance

Reference standards for mechanical design review and compliance verification.

IEC / BS 7671 / NFPA 70

Standard

Electrical Standards

Application area

Electrical review

Project relevance

Reference standards for electrical design review and compliance verification.

NFPA Fire Protection Standards

Standard

Fire Protection Standards

Application area

Fire review

Project relevance

Reference standards for fire protection design review and compliance verification.

ISO 19650

Standard

BIM Information Management

Application area

BIM review

Project relevance

BIM deliverable quality and information management review criteria.

Institution of Civil Engineers

Standard

Design Review Protocol

Application area

Review process

Project relevance

Structured design review process for infrastructure and building projects.

Local Authority Requirements

Standard

Approval and Compliance

Application area

Regulatory review

Project relevance

Authority having jurisdiction requirements verified during compliance review.

Insurance and Warranty Requirements

Standard

Project Insurance Standards

Application area

Risk assessment

Project relevance

Insurance-driven technical requirements for covered projects and claims.

Applicable standards depend on the project location, building use, authority having jurisdiction, employer requirements and contract documents. The current adopted edition must be confirmed at the beginning of each project.

Project deliverables and documentation

  • Design review report

    Structured findings with severity ranking, recommendations and reference to design documents.

  • Peer check report

    Independent verification of calculations, selections and compliance with signed certification.

  • Tender evaluation report

    Technical assessment of contractor submissions with compliance matrix and recommendation.

  • Site inspection report

    Documented findings with photographs, location references and corrective action requirements.

  • Technical due diligence report

    MEP condition assessment, compliance status and capex forecast for property transactions.

  • Value engineering assessment

    Impact analysis of proposed changes against performance, compliance and lifecycle cost.

  • Compliance gap analysis

    Existing installation assessment against current code requirements with upgrade recommendations.

  • Risk register

    Technical risks with probability, impact, mitigation and responsibility assignment.

  • Expert witness report

    Technical analysis and opinion for dispute resolution, defects claims or insurance assessment.

  • Progress review minutes

    Periodic advisory meeting records with action items and decision documentation.

  • Handover advisory report

    Assessment of commissioning completeness, documentation quality and operational readiness.

  • Operational performance review

    Post-occupancy assessment comparing operational data against design predictions.

Quality control and verification

  • Review criteria and checklists agreed with client before document review commences.

  • Findings independently verified by second reviewer before report issue.

  • Peer check calculations performed using independent methods and software where applicable.

  • Site inspection findings supported by photographic evidence and location references.

  • Due diligence reports reviewed against RICS or client-specified reporting standards.

  • Advisory recommendations clearly distinguished from design decisions remaining with design team.

Applicable project types

  • Developer clients requiring independent oversight of design and construction contractor performance.

  • Property acquisitions and refinancing requiring MEP due diligence and capex forecasting.

  • Public sector projects with independent peer review and value for money assessment requirements.

  • Complex buildings where design and build contractor proposals require independent technical evaluation.

  • Dispute resolution and defects investigation requiring expert technical analysis and reporting.

  • Portfolio asset management requiring condition surveys and compliance gap analysis across multiple properties.

Frequently asked questions

  • What is the difference between design review and peer checking?

    Design review assesses documentation against brief, standards and best practice with findings and recommendations. Peer checking provides independent recalculation and verification of specific design outputs with formal certification of review completion.

  • When should owner-side advisory begin?

    Advisory can begin at any project stage. Early engagement at concept or schematic design provides greatest influence on outcomes. Construction-phase advisory supports quality verification and decision-making during installation.

  • What does MEP technical due diligence include?

    Due diligence includes visual condition survey, operational testing where accessible, compliance assessment against current codes, remaining life estimation and capital expenditure forecasting for major plant replacement.

  • Can technical consultancy support tender evaluation?

    Technical assessment of contractor submissions evaluates compliance with specifications, qualifications, exclusions and value engineering proposals. Scored evaluation matrices support client decision-making alongside commercial assessment.

  • Is expert witness support available for disputes?

    Technical analysis and reporting supports contractual disputes, defects claims and insurance assessments. Reports are prepared to standards acceptable for adjudication, arbitration or litigation proceedings.

Discuss technical consultancy scope

Contact our advisory team to review design audit, peer checking, due diligence or owner-side representation requirements for your project.