ASHRAE 90.1
Standard
Energy Standard for Buildings
Application area
US energy compliance
Project relevance
Appendix G performance rating method for beyond-code compliance demonstration.
Hourly dynamic simulation, compliance modelling and parametric analysis supporting HVAC system selection, envelope optimisation and certification pathway verification.
Energy modelling at SEINZEN uses dynamic thermal simulation to predict building energy performance before system selection and envelope design are fixed. Models are constructed from architectural geometry, proposed MEP systems and climate data to generate hourly load profiles, annual energy consumption and peak demand estimates.
Compliance modelling supports ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G, EN ISO 52000, SBEM and project-specific certification pathways including LEED, BREEAM and local authority requirements. Baseline and proposed models are developed with documented assumptions traceable to design team inputs.
Parametric analysis evaluates design alternatives — glazing specification, insulation levels, HVAC system types and renewable integration — with results presented as comparative reports supporting design team decision-making. Uncertainty in inputs is acknowledged with sensitivity analysis where appropriate.
Model outputs inform HVAC equipment sizing, central plant capacity, utility connection requirements and lifecycle cost comparisons. Results are integrated with architectural and MEP design teams through documented review sessions.
Hourly energy models using IES VE, EnergyPlus or DesignBuilder with validated geometry and system inputs.
ASHRAE 90.1, Part L, EN ISO 52000 and local authority compliance models with baseline comparison.
Heating, cooling and ventilation load profiles for equipment sizing and central plant capacity.
Alternative scenario modelling for envelope, system and renewable options with comparative reporting.
LEED, BREEAM and WELL energy credit modelling with documented credit achievement verification.
Solar PV, solar thermal and ground-source heat pump yield modelling for integration studies.
Peak demand and annual consumption estimates for utility connection and tariff assessment.
Energy model outputs linked to capital and operational cost comparison for system selection.
Model review sessions with architectural and MEP teams to translate results into design decisions.
Simulation objectives, compliance targets, software selection and input data requirements agreed at project outset.
Architectural geometry, envelope properties and baseline systems modelled per compliance protocol.
Design team inputs incorporated with HVAC systems, lighting and renewables represented per current design.
Baseline comparison, credit achievement and authority submission documentation prepared.
Design alternative scenarios modelled with comparative results supporting optimisation decisions.
Load profiles and energy results communicated to MEP team for equipment sizing and system confirmation.
EnergyPlus, IES VE Apache or DesignBuilder selection based on project complexity and compliance requirements.
TMY, TRY or IWEC climate files matched to project location with future climate scenario consideration.
U-values, SHGC, thermal mass and infiltration rates from architectural specifications and test data.
Occupancy, lighting, equipment and metabolic gains scheduled per space type and operating hours.
Ideal loads, detailed system templates or custom equipment models depending on analysis objective.
ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G or EN ISO 52000 baseline rules applied consistently for compliance comparison.
PV array orientation, inverter efficiency and grid export assumptions for on-site generation assessment.
Input parameter sensitivity analysis identifying variables with greatest impact on results.
Distinction between peak demand for equipment sizing and annual consumption for operational cost.
Mixed-mode and passive ventilation strategies with airflow network or CONTAM integration.
EUI = E_total / A_floor
EUI = energy use intensity (kWh/m²·yr); E_total = annual energy consumption (kWh); A_floor = conditioned floor area (m²)
Building energy performance benchmarking against certification targets and code limits.
Separate fuel types by source energy or convert to equivalent primary energy per compliance protocol.
Savings = (E_baseline − E_proposed) / E_baseline × 100
Savings = percentage energy savings (%); E_baseline = baseline model consumption; E_proposed = proposed design consumption
Compliance margin calculation for ASHRAE 90.1 and similar performance-based codes.
Apply protocol-specific baseline rules; document all credit-eligible measures.
Q_peak = Σ(Q_envelope + Q_internal + Q_solar + Q_ventilation)
Q_peak = peak cooling load (kW); components = envelope, internal, solar and ventilation gains
Peak load verification from dynamic simulation against steady-state load calculations.
Dynamic peaks may differ from design-day steady-state; use simulation output for equipment sizing confirmation.
PV_yield = A_panel × G × η_panel × PR
PV_yield = annual generation (kWh); A_panel = array area (m²); G = annual irradiance (kWh/m²); η_panel = module efficiency; PR = performance ratio
On-site solar PV generation estimation for renewable energy credit and utility offset.
Apply shading, soiling and temperature derating in performance ratio.
LCC = C_capital + Σ(C_energy / (1+r)^t)
LCC = lifecycle cost; C_capital = initial cost; C_energy = annual energy cost; r = discount rate; t = year
Lifecycle cost comparison of design alternatives using energy model consumption outputs.
Include maintenance, replacement and escalation factors per project financial parameters.
Final design values must be determined using project-specific inputs, applicable standards, manufacturer data and engineering judgement.
Architectural and MEP Revit models provide geometry and spatial data for energy model construction through gbXML export or direct integration.
Space boundaries, zone assignments and internal load data are extracted from BIM models with manual verification against design team inputs.
Model iteration tracks design changes with updated simulation runs comparing results against previous milestones.
Energy model assumptions and results are documented in project information delivery plans aligned to ISO 19650 data requirements.
ASHRAE 90.1
Energy Standard for Buildings
US energy compliance
Appendix G performance rating method for beyond-code compliance demonstration.
ASHRAE 209
Energy Simulation Aided Design
Simulation process
Standardised energy modelling process from early design through operation.
ISO 52000
Energy Performance of Buildings
International energy assessment
Overall energy performance assessment framework and EPB standards series.
EN ISO 52016
Energy Needs for Heating and Cooling
European load calculation
Hourly energy needs calculation for heating and cooling.
CIBSE TM54
Evaluating Operational Energy Performance
Operational energy
Bridging design-stage modelling with operational performance verification.
LEED v4.1
Energy and Atmosphere Credits
Certification
Optimise energy performance credit modelling requirements.
BREEAM Ene 01
Energy Performance Credit
Certification
EPC comparison and energy performance benchmarking for BREEAM assessment.
Part L (UK)
Conservation of Fuel and Power
UK building regulations
SBEM and dynamic simulation compliance for UK new-build and refurbishment.
ASHRAE 140
Standard Method of Test for Energy Analysis Computer Programs
Software validation
Bestest validation cases for simulation software accuracy verification.
IPMVP
International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol
M&V
Measurement and verification framework linking design models to operational performance.
Climate Action Planning Standards
Local Authority Requirements
Planning compliance
Energy strategy and carbon reduction targets for planning submission.
ASHRAE 100
Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings
Retrofit assessment
Energy audit and improvement assessment for existing building projects.
| Code | Standard | Application area | Project relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASHRAE 90.1 | Energy Standard for Buildings | US energy compliance | Appendix G performance rating method for beyond-code compliance demonstration. |
| ASHRAE 209 | Energy Simulation Aided Design | Simulation process | Standardised energy modelling process from early design through operation. |
| ISO 52000 | Energy Performance of Buildings | International energy assessment | Overall energy performance assessment framework and EPB standards series. |
| EN ISO 52016 | Energy Needs for Heating and Cooling | European load calculation | Hourly energy needs calculation for heating and cooling. |
| CIBSE TM54 | Evaluating Operational Energy Performance | Operational energy | Bridging design-stage modelling with operational performance verification. |
| LEED v4.1 | Energy and Atmosphere Credits | Certification | Optimise energy performance credit modelling requirements. |
| BREEAM Ene 01 | Energy Performance Credit | Certification | EPC comparison and energy performance benchmarking for BREEAM assessment. |
| Part L (UK) | Conservation of Fuel and Power | UK building regulations | SBEM and dynamic simulation compliance for UK new-build and refurbishment. |
| ASHRAE 140 | Standard Method of Test for Energy Analysis Computer Programs | Software validation | Bestest validation cases for simulation software accuracy verification. |
| IPMVP | International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol | M&V | Measurement and verification framework linking design models to operational performance. |
| Climate Action Planning Standards | Local Authority Requirements | Planning compliance | Energy strategy and carbon reduction targets for planning submission. |
| ASHRAE 100 | Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings | Retrofit assessment | Energy audit and improvement assessment for existing building projects. |
Applicable standards depend on the project location, building use, authority having jurisdiction, employer requirements and contract documents. The current adopted edition must be confirmed at the beginning of each project.
Simulation objectives, software, inputs and compliance targets documented.
Compliance baseline model per applicable protocol with documented assumptions.
Design team model with current architectural and MEP system inputs.
Baseline comparison results with savings percentage and credit achievement summary.
Hourly heating, cooling and ventilation load profiles for equipment sizing.
Design alternative comparison with energy, cost and comfort trade-off analysis.
Energy use intensity comparison against certification targets and sector benchmarks.
On-site generation yield estimates and grid offset calculations.
Documentation formatted for LEED, BREEAM or authority submission requirements.
Results summary with recommendations for design integration decisions.
Input parameter impact assessment identifying critical design variables.
Complete model files, input data and results for audit and future reference.
Model inputs independently reviewed against architectural and MEP design documentation.
Baseline model verified against compliance protocol rules before proposed model comparison.
Simulation software version and weather file documented for reproducibility.
Results cross-checked against steady-state load calculations for peak load consistency.
Parametric analysis scenarios reviewed with design team before report issue.
Certification submission documents verified against current credit requirement versions.
Commercial towers targeting LEED or BREEAM certification with performance-based compliance.
Mixed-use developments requiring planning authority energy strategy submission.
Healthcare and laboratory buildings with high ventilation loads and 24-hour operation profiles.
Data centres with continuous cooling load and PUE optimisation requirements.
Retrofit projects assessing improvement measures against operational baseline consumption.
Educational campuses with varied building types and central plant optimisation studies.
Concept-stage modelling supports early system and envelope decisions. Compliance modelling typically requires schematic design inputs. ASHRAE 209 defines modelling stages from early design through operation.
IES Virtual Environment, EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder are used depending on project requirements and compliance protocol. Software selection is agreed at modelling scope stage.
Hourly load profiles from dynamic simulation provide peak and part-load data for chiller, boiler and AHU sizing. Results are compared with steady-state load calculations and discrepancies investigated.
Energy strategy reports, EUI benchmarks and carbon reduction demonstrations are prepared for planning submission where local authority requirements apply.
Compliance modelling follows protocol-specific baseline rules for code or certification verification. Design optimisation modelling evaluates alternatives to inform system and envelope selection without protocol constraints.
Contact our building performance team to review simulation requirements, compliance targets or parametric analysis for your project.